Financial Institutions
Posted by: chickenman
22nd Nov 2021 09:10pm
financial institutions; ie: banks , credit unions and insurance companies all have an obligation to serve their customers, but it seems a lot of their profits go to share-holders and "upper echelon" executives. should these institutions be banned from the share-market so the profits can go back to the customers/clients??
You must be a member to reply to this chat topic. Click here to sign in.
Help Caféstudy members by responding to their questions, or ask your own in Café Chat, and you will get the chance of earning extra rewards. Caféstudy will match these and donate equally to our two chosen Australian charities.
Australian Marine Conservation Society are an independent charity, staffed by a committed group of scientists, educators and passionate advocates who have defended Australia’s oceans for over 50 years.
ReachOut is the most accessed online mental health service for young people and their parents in Australia. Their trusted self-help information, peer-support program and referral tools save lives by helping young people be well and stay well. The information they offer parents makes it easier for them to help their teenagers, too.
Comments 2
jtmorri
I think that is the structure of a mutual fund and not for profit, not a corporation. I do however think institutions over charge with a lot of variation between different company policies. I personally vote against the executive team renumeration for company meetings on a bi-annual basis as I feel they do nothing and receive large payments. It would be appropriate for companies and their policies to have to meet a fairness test. That will only happen if shareholders make a lot of noise for a change. Otherwise, you could look for mutual and not for profit organisations in the different financial areas for better value or a company with a reasonable premium for service offered. You always have to shop around and never renew a policy, as they always keep increasing premiums.
echo 01
Great idea if you want the government to hsve more say in your retorement. The shareholders and upper enchelons are in a lot of cases the superanuation funds us common workets are investd in. The same goes for Tech companies and miners a lot ofpeople rail against.